Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • About Bonfire
Mastodon Migration and 1 other boosted
Dr. John Barentine FRAS
@JohnBarentine@scicomm.xyz  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

An important white paper to read for anyone interested in how large satellite constellations affect #RadioAstronomy: "Quiet Skies Report: A Primer on Protecting Radio Astronomy in the Age of Satellite Mega-Constellations" by Greg Hellbourg (CalTech)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00941

It's a very good introduction to the subject that gives a 30,000-foot view of the problem.

#Space #Satellites #Astronomy

arXiv.org

Quiet Skies Report: A Primer on Protecting Radio Astronomy in the Age of Satellite Mega-Constellations

The rapid expansion of satellite constellations is transforming the radio-frequency environment around the Earth. At the same time, radio astronomy is entering a new era of sensitivity and survey capability, requiring unprecedented control of interference. This primer introduces satellite operators, engineers, spectrum managers and policy makers to the basic concepts of radio astronomy, explains why the discipline is uniquely vulnerable to interference, and outlines the regulatory and practical tools available to manage coexistence.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Dr. John Barentine FRAS
@JohnBarentine@scicomm.xyz  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

An important white paper to read for anyone interested in how large satellite constellations affect #RadioAstronomy: "Quiet Skies Report: A Primer on Protecting Radio Astronomy in the Age of Satellite Mega-Constellations" by Greg Hellbourg (CalTech)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00941

It's a very good introduction to the subject that gives a 30,000-foot view of the problem.

#Space #Satellites #Astronomy

arXiv.org

Quiet Skies Report: A Primer on Protecting Radio Astronomy in the Age of Satellite Mega-Constellations

The rapid expansion of satellite constellations is transforming the radio-frequency environment around the Earth. At the same time, radio astronomy is entering a new era of sensitivity and survey capability, requiring unprecedented control of interference. This primer introduces satellite operators, engineers, spectrum managers and policy makers to the basic concepts of radio astronomy, explains why the discipline is uniquely vulnerable to interference, and outlines the regulatory and practical tools available to manage coexistence.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Prof. Sam Lawler boosted
Dr. John Barentine FRAS
@JohnBarentine@scicomm.xyz  ·  activity timestamp last week

A @Nature paper published today argues that "Satellite megaconstellations will threaten space-based astronomy" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09759-5

Here's the punchline of the paper: satellites could be a problem even for orbiting space telescopes, but the impact depends on how many are launched. "Our results show that if these constellations are completed, one-third of the images of the Hubble Space Telescope will be contaminated, while the SPHEREx (Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization and Ices Explorer), ARRAKIHS (Analysis of Resolved Remnants of Accreted galaxies as a Key Instrument for Halo Surveys) and Xuntian space telescopes will have more than 96% of +0.3 their exposures affected, with 5.6^+0.3_−0.3, 69^+21_−22, and 92^+11_−10 trails per exposure, respectively, with an average surface brightness of μ = 19 ± 2 mag arcsec−2."

#Astronomy #Satellites #Megaconstellations #SpaceTelescope

The average number of satellite trails visible in each exposure is shown in relation to both the number of artificial satellites orbiting Earth (lower x axis) and epoch (upper x axis). Blue, SPHEREx; red, Xuntian; purple, ARRAKIHS; black, Hubble Space Telescope. Contours represent the 95% confidence levels for the mean number of trails. Horizontal solid line indicates one trail per exposure critical contamination level; vertical dotted line marks the current number of active and inactive satellites in orbit (15,000 as of March 2025).
The average number of satellite trails visible in each exposure is shown in relation to both the number of artificial satellites orbiting Earth (lower x axis) and epoch (upper x axis). Blue, SPHEREx; red, Xuntian; purple, ARRAKIHS; black, Hubble Space Telescope. Contours represent the 95% confidence levels for the mean number of trails. Horizontal solid line indicates one trail per exposure critical contamination level; vertical dotted line marks the current number of active and inactive satellites in orbit (15,000 as of March 2025).
The average number of satellite trails visible in each exposure is shown in relation to both the number of artificial satellites orbiting Earth (lower x axis) and epoch (upper x axis). Blue, SPHEREx; red, Xuntian; purple, ARRAKIHS; black, Hubble Space Telescope. Contours represent the 95% confidence levels for the mean number of trails. Horizontal solid line indicates one trail per exposure critical contamination level; vertical dotted line marks the current number of active and inactive satellites in orbit (15,000 as of March 2025).
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Dr. John Barentine FRAS
@JohnBarentine@scicomm.xyz  ·  activity timestamp last week

A @Nature paper published today argues that "Satellite megaconstellations will threaten space-based astronomy" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09759-5

Here's the punchline of the paper: satellites could be a problem even for orbiting space telescopes, but the impact depends on how many are launched. "Our results show that if these constellations are completed, one-third of the images of the Hubble Space Telescope will be contaminated, while the SPHEREx (Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization and Ices Explorer), ARRAKIHS (Analysis of Resolved Remnants of Accreted galaxies as a Key Instrument for Halo Surveys) and Xuntian space telescopes will have more than 96% of +0.3 their exposures affected, with 5.6^+0.3_−0.3, 69^+21_−22, and 92^+11_−10 trails per exposure, respectively, with an average surface brightness of μ = 19 ± 2 mag arcsec−2."

#Astronomy #Satellites #Megaconstellations #SpaceTelescope

The average number of satellite trails visible in each exposure is shown in relation to both the number of artificial satellites orbiting Earth (lower x axis) and epoch (upper x axis). Blue, SPHEREx; red, Xuntian; purple, ARRAKIHS; black, Hubble Space Telescope. Contours represent the 95% confidence levels for the mean number of trails. Horizontal solid line indicates one trail per exposure critical contamination level; vertical dotted line marks the current number of active and inactive satellites in orbit (15,000 as of March 2025).
The average number of satellite trails visible in each exposure is shown in relation to both the number of artificial satellites orbiting Earth (lower x axis) and epoch (upper x axis). Blue, SPHEREx; red, Xuntian; purple, ARRAKIHS; black, Hubble Space Telescope. Contours represent the 95% confidence levels for the mean number of trails. Horizontal solid line indicates one trail per exposure critical contamination level; vertical dotted line marks the current number of active and inactive satellites in orbit (15,000 as of March 2025).
The average number of satellite trails visible in each exposure is shown in relation to both the number of artificial satellites orbiting Earth (lower x axis) and epoch (upper x axis). Blue, SPHEREx; red, Xuntian; purple, ARRAKIHS; black, Hubble Space Telescope. Contours represent the 95% confidence levels for the mean number of trails. Horizontal solid line indicates one trail per exposure critical contamination level; vertical dotted line marks the current number of active and inactive satellites in orbit (15,000 as of March 2025).
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

Bonfire Dinteg Labs

This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes. This is not a production site. There are no backups for now. Data, including profiles may be wiped without notice. No service or other guarantees expressed or implied.

Bonfire Dinteg Labs: About · Code of conduct · Privacy ·
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login