Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • About Bonfire
Nonilex
@Nonilex@masto.ai  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

The conservative legal movement has long argued an originalist understanding of the #Constitution — an interpretation that looks to how the document was understood at the time of the nation’s founding—demands letting the president remove #ExecutiveBranch officials as he sees fit. The so-called “unitary executive theory,” says the president should have complete control of the exec branch & congressional efforts to shield leaders of #independent agencies from #politics should be forbidden.

#law 🧵

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Nonilex
@Nonilex@masto.ai replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

In Sept, though, a leading originalist law professor, Caleb E. Nelson, challenged that wisdom in an article that attracted attention in legal circles & beyond. He wrote that the text of the #Constitution & the historical evidence surrounding it in fact grant #Congress broad authority to shape the #ExecutiveBranch, including by putting limits on the president’s #power to fire people.

#law #HumphreysExecutor #SCOTUS #ActivistCourt #Trump #Autocracy #SeparationOfPowers 🧵
https://democracyproject.org/posts/must-administrative-officers-serve-at-the-presidents-pleasure

Special Feature: Must Administrative Officers Serve at the President’s Pleasure?

A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

Bonfire Dinteg Labs

This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes. This is not a production site. There are no backups for now. Data, including profiles may be wiped without notice. No service or other guarantees expressed or implied.

Bonfire Dinteg Labs: About · Code of conduct · Privacy ·
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login