20 min
Just the opening few minutes is #neato enough of a description.
I can’t help thinking that somehow this would be for an interesting basis for physics theory
Post
20 min
Just the opening few minutes is #neato enough of a description.
I can’t help thinking that somehow this would be for an interesting basis for physics theory
@GhostOnTheHalfShell @dlakelan
Ghost! You're like W. Mosler, bugging me about getting onto physics which is already physics. 😉 🤣 (He's an "it's all from gauge gravity" guy.)
I always have to stretch it a bit for "Doctor Mosler." but in this case not so much. In fact quantum field theory is Gaussian splatter already. In QFT there is basically "no physically relevant path integral we can do except a gaussian." Perturbation theory is just gaussian integrals with the series corrections to some loop order or ladder approx. or whathaveyou, then renormalization.
The Feynman propagator being the Greens function which is the inverse of the equation of motion differential operator for a delta-distribution gaussian response function (gaussian of vanishing width).
So the difference in physics/QFT is we do not have to splatter the gaussain, instead we do perturbation theory using Feynman diagrams (or maybe in the future Amplituhedra?)
BTW: I started trying to use Blender about 23 years ago. But could not master it within 6 hours, so gave up.🤣 Now I regret not persisting and goofing off more on that particular postdoc posting.
I know the name Feynman. He was really good safe cracker 
This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes. This is not a production site. There are no backups for now. Data, including profiles may be wiped without notice. No service or other guarantees expressed or implied.