#Tag
We've published a new legal opinion, raising questions over the legality of the use of AI tools in the UK asylum system.
Applicants aren't being informed of their use by decision-makers, nor being given the opportunity to correct errors that might be made in AI generated summaries.
Find out more ⬇️
We need an immediate ban on the use of AI tools in the UK asylum process.
There are many ways to clear the Home Office’s backlog of asylum cases and raise standards – these tools are not the answer.
The UK government must not automate the hostile environment for migrants with AI.
Write to your MP ⬇️
https://action.openrightsgroup.org/ban-ai-tools-asylum-decision-making
We need an immediate ban on the use of AI tools in the UK asylum process.
There are many ways to clear the Home Office’s backlog of asylum cases and raise standards – these tools are not the answer.
The UK government must not automate the hostile environment for migrants with AI.
Write to your MP ⬇️
https://action.openrightsgroup.org/ban-ai-tools-asylum-decision-making
We need an immediate ban on the use of AI tools in the UK asylum process.
There are many ways to clear the Home Office’s backlog of asylum cases and raise standards – these tools are not the answer.
The UK government must not automate the hostile environment for migrants with AI.
Write to your MP ⬇️
https://action.openrightsgroup.org/ban-ai-tools-asylum-decision-making
We've published a new legal opinion, raising questions over the legality of the use of AI tools in the UK asylum system.
Applicants aren't being informed of their use by decision-makers, nor being given the opportunity to correct errors that might be made in AI generated summaries.
Find out more ⬇️
We've published a new legal opinion, raising questions over the legality of the use of AI tools in the UK asylum system.
Applicants aren't being informed of their use by decision-makers, nor being given the opportunity to correct errors that might be made in AI generated summaries.
Find out more ⬇️
Asylum applicants aren't being told that AI is used in decision-making.
The legal opinion finds that, as a matter of procedural fairness, this is likely to be unlawful.
It could breach data protection, as applicants don't have the opportunity to correct inaccurate summaries of personal data.
Asylum applicants aren't being told that AI is used in decision-making.
The legal opinion finds that, as a matter of procedural fairness, this is likely to be unlawful.
It could breach data protection, as applicants don't have the opportunity to correct inaccurate summaries of personal data.
“Technology can assist decision-making, but it cannot undermine the careful human judgment required in asylum cases.
Where AI tools are used without adequate safeguards, there is a real risk that unlawful or unfair decisions may result.
If AI tools are influencing asylum decisions, there must be full transparency about how those systems operate and how their outputs are used."
🗣️ Robin Allen KC and Dee Masters, Cloisters Chambers.
The failure to inform asylum applicants of the use of AI in decision-making is likely UNLAWFUL.
A new legal opinion for ORG finds that the use of AI tools by the UK Home Office doesn't meet legal obligations nor standards in the AI Playbook.
We need full transparency to ensure lawful and fair decisions.
Read more ⬇️
Asylum applicants aren't being told that AI is used in decision-making.
The legal opinion finds that, as a matter of procedural fairness, this is likely to be unlawful.
It could breach data protection, as applicants don't have the opportunity to correct inaccurate summaries of personal data.
AI tools create a new text of interviews and material such as country of origin information.
In the UK Home Office’s evaluation, 9% of AI summaries were so flawed they had to be removed.
There's a significant risk that asylum decisions will be based upon and impaired by material errors of fact.
This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes. This is not a production site. There are no backups for now. Data, including profiles may be wiped without notice. No service or other guarantees expressed or implied.
